Many different topics formulating at once. Should narrow asap.
What is my project and why is it important? What am I contributing?
As far as my proposal goes: it definitely needs to be revised, add an intro and dont worry about annotating if I have extensive notes on each text.
*remind to email a review she wrote on Ales Krims book
My approach also needs to be taken into accout: interviews, participant observation, archival/web research, mapping
Interviews: come up with a list of interviewees, and questions – questions should be open-ended and more controversial questions should be inserted at the end.
Interview Formats:
- Structured – same Q’s to all
- Semi- Structured – have some questions but go w/flow
- Open Ended – no questions prepared
Look up counterpulse.org (robin’s podcast on alternative space!)
Chris Carlson is contact for counterpulse
TO READ/REVIEW/CONSIDER:
- Pierre Bourdieu: Cultural Capital/Social Accumulation
- Ranciere: Politics of Aesthetics
- Stuart Hall: Deconstructing the Popular
- Deleuze & Guattari: “Rhizome” Chapter (post-Marxist, networking, fragmentation)
- Hart/Negre – Empire
- Saskia Sassen: (new book) – locality (as produced as a form of knowledge) and network
- Gramsci/Raymond Williams – Hegemony